Why 500 accelerators might be holding UK startups back A new report suggests the UK might have reached quantity over quality when it comes to startup programmes. Written by Helena Young Published on 30 July 2025 Our experts We are a team of writers, experimenters and researchers providing you with the best advice with zero bias or partiality. Written and reviewed by: Helena Young Deputy Editor Direct to your inbox Sign up to the Startups Weekly Newsletter Stay informed on the top business stories with Startups.co.uk’s weekly email newsletter SUBSCRIBE Startup accelerators in the UK need clearer programme standards to more effectively support those starting a business, according to a report by a leading entrepreneurial think tank.The report from The Entrepreneurs Network (TEN), named ‘Full Speed Ahead’, points out that the UK is now home to over 500 accelerator programmes. Since 2016, the UK’s national innovation agency, Innovate UK, has invested £219m in the programmes alone.Despite the significant public funding for these schemes, though, TEN argues that “questions nonetheless persist about effectiveness, strategic alignment, and return on investment”.Featuring interviews with industry experts and founders, the report recommends four reforms to enhance quality and help entrepreneurs navigate the support ecosystem.“More transparency” needed in UK startup supportThe UK is recognised as a hotbed for global entrepreneurship. One report estimates that we are now the world’s second-largest startup ecosystem in terms of funding, ahead of China. Partly, this is enabled by government support. Seed and pre-seed startups are supported through organisations like Innovate UK and TechUK, which deliver funding and know-how through incubators, accelerators, and support programmes. But, as the TEN report highlights, a lack of clear standards and shared definitions means that many of these initiatives are operating without clear metrics for success. This is making it difficult to identify and funnel resources towards the more effective schemes.The network makes various critiques of the current system. These include: Misclassified accelerators that provide little more than basic workshopsMisaligned programmes that “shoehorn” specialist firms into generic curriculumsAn overfocus on superfast scale-ups, over companies aiming for sustainable growthLondon-centric distribution (nearly 60% of all accelerators are based in the capital)Rather than empowering entrepreneurs, it warns that the current system is cycling founders through multiple support models, often without meaningful progress or access to investment. London hiding regional underperformanceThe report also cites data from Beauhurst that only 57% of listed incubators or accelerators are actually active in the UK. One third have closed, and 10% are in a “state of limbo”.In some regions, this figure is even higher. TEN analysis finds that in regions like Northern Ireland and Yorkshire and the Humber, over 50% of accelerator programmes have shut. In Scotland and the East of England, over one in five programmes are classed as ‘Amber’, meaning they might be listed as active, but no recent activity has been recorded.Philip Salter, Founder of The Entrepreneurs Network, said: “The UK has plenty of startup support programmes, but we don’t always know if they actually work. Founders can’t even be sure these programmes will still exist before they finish.”What does The Entrepreneurs Network report recommend?According to The Entrepreneurs Network, the UK government must reform its startup support initiatives to better align offerings with founder needs. It makes four recommendations to do so:1. Create a clear classification system for programmes and leadership, with defined minimum standards and outcome metrics2. Reform impact measurement to focus on founder-centric metrics that track entrepreneurs’ ongoing journeys rather than just quick wins3. Replace stop-start public funding cycles with 3-5-year contracts, and defund programmes that repeatedly fail to meet milestones4. Launch a funding voucher scheme, piloted by Innovate UK and supported by a registry of accredited providers, to give founders control over spending“We need reforms that make programme outcomes transparent and reward schemes that create lasting impact”, adds Salter. Share this post facebook twitter linkedin Tags News and Features Written by: Helena Young Deputy Editor Helena is Deputy Editor at Startups. She oversees all news and supporting content on Startups, and is also the author of the weekly Startups email newsletter, delivering must-know SME updates straight to their inbox. From interviewing Wetherspoon's boss Tim Martin to spotting data-led working from home trends, her insight has been featured by major trade publications including the ICAEW, and news outlets like the BBC, ITV News, Daily Express, and HuffPost UK. With a background in PR and marketing, Helena is particularly passionate about giving early-stage startups a platform to boost their brands. That's one reason she manages the Startups 100 Index, our annual ranking of new UK businesses.